Evidence-sensitive claim support intelligence

Pilot a ranked re-review list on approved claims your team already uses.

Send 100–300 approved claims and the sources your team wants included. NC identifies which claims deserve attention, why they appeared, and the reviewer question to answer next.

This is for you if:

  • You can name 100–300 approved claims your team already uses
  • You have a review owner and source list ready
  • You need to prove value before budget commitment

Not for you if:

  • You want per-claim pricing / SaaS subscription / unlimited claims
  • You don't have approved claims to send — NC starts with what you already use

Approved-claim re-review pilot

Fit first

A source-traced review across 100–300 approved claims. We confirm the claim set, source coverage, and useful output before pricing the pilot.

  • Claim list

    The approved claims under review, where they appear, who owns review, and what your team can make available.

  • Evidence map

    Sources, qualifiers, populations, endpoints, labels, guidelines, and timing boundaries each claim depends on.

  • Prioritized list

    Which claims need review now, why they are prioritized, what changed, and what specific question should be answered.

  • Source trail

    Source references, review date, reproducibility hash, and re-review conditions that can be verified against the source record.

Pilot scope and price are confirmed after the fit check. The initial ranked list and selected review assessments are produced within 5 business days.

What you get in 2 weeks

Ranked re-review list

100–300 claims → 5–15 flagged for review, ranked by urgency.

5 claim-specific assessments

What changed, what still holds, what needs a caveat, the reviewer question.

Source trail & reproducibility

Every finding pinned to a source, dated, hashed, verifiable.

Fit confirmation for pilot scope

Clear go/no-go on whether a full pilot is measurable.

What persists after the pilot

Claim history

The exact approved claims, where they appear, owner context, and review windows.

Evidence map

Sources, qualifiers, populations, endpoints, and authority claims the review depends on.

Decision history

What changed, why another look was or was not useful, what your team decided, and the source trail behind each assessment.

How the pilot starts

Send approved claims, where they appear, and the sources to include. We confirm whether the ranked list is useful before any commitment. NC owns evidence movement, review rationale, reviewer questions, and source-traced assessments. Qualified reviewers own materiality, final decisions, routing, approval, and implementation.