Trust Standard

What has to be true before a dossier is useful.

We check whether the data still backs up the claim — giving you a read you can verify, before a decision locks.

What a defensible brief looks like

Reconstructs what was known at the time

The dossier pins every read to a specific date. It shows what the data supported then — and whether anything has changed since.

Every finding can be verified

You can trace every conclusion back to the source. The dossier shows what the data supports and what it doesn't.

States what would change the read

A useful dossier names the data point, trial result, or safety update that would flip the conclusion.

Keeps the limits visible

If the data is thin, the dossier says so. If it falls outside scope, the dossier stops.

Keeps source support visible

Every conclusion traces to a source the reviewer can inspect. The dossier shows what is supported and what is not.

States what would tip the conclusion

A useful dossier names the evidence, source-quality issue, or context change that would invalidate the current read.

Preserves limits instead of smoothing them away

If the evidence is thin, the dossier says so. If it falls outside scope, the dossier stops.

Not an analyst's opinion.

The read is produced by a system that tracks changes in the public record. That means:

Repeatable

Same claim, same data, same time window — same read, every time. No analyst drift, no recency bias.

Time-locked

Data that arrived after your review date stays out. Every source carries a timestamp. You know what was knowable when the decision was still open.

Verifiable

Every finding maps to a specific edit, citation, or event in the public record. You can check the source trail yourself.

Auto-triggering recheck

When the data shifts, the claim gets flagged for re-review. No manual monitoring needed.

Sometimes, not always.

Changes in the public record are a signal — not a guarantee. When an edit is driven by a new trial, a safety update, or a guideline change, it's worth paying attention to. When it's just routine cleanup or an editorial dispute, it's noise. We tell you which is which — or when we can't tell.

Driver matters

A safety update that triggers a caveat is not the same as an editor fixing a typo. A citation removed after a trial retraction is not the same as a citation reorganized. We classify the driver where possible.

Public data, not private truth

The public data shows you what survived editing, sourcing, and challenge. It doesn't tell you what is medically true. It tells you what the record will currently allow to stand.

Time window

The changes we track may happen before, during, or after the official decision. Their value isn't that they're always early. It's that they're observable, timestamped, and can be reconstructed.

Submit a claim for scoping.

Send the contested claim, company or asset, and decision window. We confirm fit and scope before any dossier is produced.