Registered forecast
FDA first-line approval of sunvozertinib precedes the NCCN first-line listing
FF-004 Registered This is the record as published. It was written down before anyone knew the answer, and it has not been touched since; the parts held only in the ledger are named below.
Guideline listing (NCCN, ESMO): offered on judgment, not a track record — calibration not yet demonstrated.
The proposition
What was claimed
On or before 2027-07-31 both of the following occur: (a) the FDA approves a first-line / initial-treatment indication for sunvozertinib (ZEGFROVY) in EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, expected as a supplement to NDA 219839 (the event FF-002 scores); and (b) a version of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer lists sunvozertinib (ZEGFROVY) as a first-line / initial systemic therapy option, at any NCCN category, for EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive metastatic non-squamous NSCLC (the event FF-001 scores) — and the date of the FDA approval action is strictly earlier than the version date of the earliest NCCN NSCLC version carrying that listing.
- Authority
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), NSCLC Guidelines Panel (US)
- Target rungA step on the record: rungs 1 to 4 are the evidence moving, rungs 5 to 7 are a guideline body, regulator or payer acting. The ladder, rung by rung
- Rung 5: Guideline action — Formal recommendation change by a recognized guideline body: grade shift, new/retracted endorsement, population expansion/restriction.
- Event classThe kind of public act the forecast is about: a guideline recommendation changing, a label changing, or a coverage policy changing
- Guideline recommendation change
- Scope
- EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive metastatic non-squamous NSCLC
The estimate
The number, and what it has to beat
A number on its own is unfalsifiable. These are the alternatives it was registered against, each with the reasoning that produced it, frozen at the same cutoff.
Reference class: new FDA indications in molecularly defined NSCLC subsets, supported by a positive randomized phase 3, paired with the NCCN NSCLC panel's listing of the same indication, ordered by date. To my understanding the panel most often lists after the FDA acts, within one or two versions, and lists ahead of the FDA for a minority of high-profile datasets; roughly 0.7 regulator-first among pairs where both occur within a year, times roughly 0.7 that both occur inside this eleven-month window, gives about 0.5. ESTIMATE FROM PRECEDENT, NOT AN ENUMERATED COUNT — no dated corpus pairing NCCN version dates with FDA action dates exists in this repo, and the one backtest that touched rung 6 was invalidated by the repo's own fda-label-v1-invalidation review under workspace/reviews/ (a review of this repo's backtest, not a source fact). Recorded as the honest state of this baseline at the cutoff.
A model that knows only clocks and cadences, with its rule stated: FDA receipt on or before 2026-07-14 (SRC-006); designation unknown, priority and standard each 0.5; goal 6 or 10 months from receipt, so the FDA date is 2027-01-14 or 2027-05-14; an action at the goal with prior 0.85. NCCN: six or more versions by July 2026 (SRC-006), so roughly monthly; with no evidence input the model treats the listing as arriving at a uniformly random version in the window with total in-window probability 0.45 (FF-001's calendar baseline used 0.4 for a twelve-month window — the same prior, not a count). Probability that the FDA date precedes a uniform NCCN date over 2026-09-06 to 2027-07-31: 6.5/11 under priority, 2.5/11 under standard, average 0.41. 0.41 x 0.85 x 0.45 = 0.16, recorded as 0.15. Every input except the receipt bound and the version count is a prior and is labelled as one.
A thoracic-oncology or market-access analyst reading the same public record on 2026-09-05 would say the panel will follow the label, as it usually does; that the FDA will act in the first half of 2027; that a panel-first listing on the NEJM data is possible but not the base case; and would not price the window censoring or the tie rule. Reconstructed as about 0.55; estimated by reconstructing that read, not by surveying analysts. The draft's own number sits below it because the draft prices the late-approval censoring and the tie.
The clock
Dates that constrain the record
- Evidence cutoff
- 2026-09-22
Nothing after this date informed the estimate. - Registered
- 2026-09-22
Frozen and hashed. The number below cannot be edited. - Resolution window
- 2026-09-23 → 2027-07-31
When the adjudicator can read the outcome. - Deadline
- 2027-07-31
No listing by this date resolves the proposition NO.
114dae9f9853bf368b35569c63d28c9aa3f183dbd10bebe9c4f5654b63d86f84 · operator record jc-1790109835432-125b0ac6
Resolution
The rule that settles the forecast
The rule is written so a reader with no view on the drug can apply it.
Two dates are read, each under its sibling's rule as amended by workspace/reviews/2026-09-05-ff-001-ff-002-falsification.md §3d, and compared at day precision, the finest either record carries. D_FDA: the submission_status_date (YYYYMMDD) of the earliest submission in the openFDA Drugs@FDA record for application number NDA219839 — queried as https://api.fda.gov/drug/drugsfda.json?search=application_number:%22NDA219839%22 — whose submission_type is SUPPL (or, if the live literal differs, is not ORIG), whose submission_status is AP, and whose approved labeling, read from Section 1 (INDICATIONS AND USAGE) of the label PDF linked in that submission's application_docs (type Label) or from the Drugs@FDA web record at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/ , covers the first-line / initial-treatment setting for EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. If openFDA has not refreshed by the reading date, the Action Date on the Drugs@FDA web record governs; if the two disagree, the date on the approval letter governs. A first-line approval under a new NDA counts, read from that NDA's ORIG row. Exclusions as in FF-002: later-line, maintenance, non-NSCLC, or conversion of the existing accelerated approval do not count; a narrower first-line population does. D_NCCN: the version date printed on the earliest version of the NCCN NSCLC guideline, dated on or before 2027-07-31, that names sunvozertinib or ZEGFROVY in the initial-systemic-therapy recommendation set for EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive metastatic non-squamous NSCLC, at any category (1, 2A, 2B or 3), whether or not marked preferred, on the algorithm page for initial systemic therapy or in the corresponding systemic-therapy table; footnotes attached to that first-line options block count, footnotes on testing, discussion text and 'Principles of' pages do not; a listing confined to subsequent-line therapy does not count. The version date is the date NCCN prints beside the version number on the guideline's cover; if a version prints a number but its date appears only in its Updates section, that date governs. NCCN distributes only its current version, so the adjudicator reads captured copies of every NSCLC version issued inside the window (the repository is to capture each with its date and digest as it appears — an operational task, not a rule change). Bracket rule when the earliest listing version was not captured: let L be the version date of the latest version known not to carry the listing and U the version date of the earliest version known to carry it; if the exact D_NCCN cannot be established, resolve YES if D_FDA is on or before L, NO if D_FDA is on or after U, and VOID with the reason 'earliest listing version date not recoverable' if D_FDA falls strictly between L and U. Resolution: YES if and only if both D_FDA and D_NCCN exist on or before 2027-07-31 and D_FDA is strictly earlier than D_NCCN. NO if D_NCCN is earlier than or equal to D_FDA — a same-day tie resolves NO, is recorded as a tie, and is not broken by appeal to the hypothesised mechanism — or if either event has not occurred by 2027-07-31. NCCN versions dated after 2027-07-31 and FDA actions dated after 2027-07-31 are ignored. Adjudication floor: read no earlier than 2027-08-31 and no later than 2027-10-31, at the same sitting as FF-001 and FF-002. Access: openFDA and Drugs@FDA are public and unauthenticated; NCCN requires free registration. No clinical judgement about the drug is needed. VOID, with the reason recorded, if a first-line recommendation set for exon 20 insertion disease is distinguishable in no version issued inside the window, or if neither openFDA nor the Drugs@FDA web record publishes per-supplement action dates at the reading date; VOID as ill-posed if the earliest listing version is dated on or before the availability cutoff.
Source read: FDA action date from openFDA Drugs@FDA for NDA 219839; NCCN listing date from the version date of the earliest captured NCCN NSCLC version carrying the listing; compared at day precision
No independent adjudicator has been named on this record yet. Until one is, resolution is a stated rule rather than a committed arrangement.
What this record will show after 2027-07-31
- The finding
- Occurred, did not occur, or ambiguous — as the rule above reads it.
- Who read it, and what
- An adjudicator with no stake in the forecast, reading the source named above, on a date recorded here.
- The number against its baselines
- 45% beside 3 baselines, each scored by the same rule, so a reader can see which of them the record should have listened to.
Reasoning
Why this number, and what would break it
The mechanism behind this number, and the conditions under which the proposition would be ill-posed, were frozen with the record at registration. They are held in the ledger, and the ledger hash on this page covers them; they are not published here.
Frozen covariatesThe facts about the evidence and the authority's process that were frozen with the forecast at its cutoff
The state of the record at the cutoff
Recorded as they stood on 2026-09-22, including the 2 fields whose honest value was unknown. A covariate table with no unknowns in it has usually been tidied.
- review pathway
- FDA leg: Breakthrough Therapy Designation for the first-line setting, reported only by sponsor releases (SRC-001 and SRC-006: 'in this setting'; SRC-007: 'for this treatment-naive patient population'); the original NDA 219839 was reviewed under PRIORITY (SRC-003, ORIG-1, AP 20250702); the supplement's designation, priority or standard, is in no archived file. A separate April 2024 designation in the platinum-pretreated setting is reported secondarily (SRC-004). NCCN leg: no statutory clock; the panel's continuous-update process, at a cadence the archive bounds at six or more versions in the first seven months of 2026 (SRC-006). The forecast object is the ordering of the two.
- submission type
- FDA leg: supplemental New Drug Application, efficacy supplement for a new line of therapy, per sponsor releases only (submitted, SRC-006; accepted, SRC-001); no supplement row in openFDA as of 2026-09-02 (SRC-003). NCCN leg: none — NCCN does not publish manufacturer submission requests.
- evidence class
- randomized, open-label, multinational phase 3 (WU-KONG28, NCT05668988) versus carboplatin-pemetrexed: 'phase 3, international' per the NEJM abstract (SRC-002); 'open-label' per the sponsor release (SRC-005) and The ASCO Post (SRC-008); enrolled December 2022 to May 2025 (SRC-008); 15 countries per SRC-005 and 16 per SRC-007; presented as ASCO late-breaking abstract LBA8500 and published in NEJM on 2026-05-29 (SRC-002, SRC-005).
- pivotal n
- 324 randomized 1:1 (163 sunvozertinib, 161 chemotherapy) per the NEJM abstract (SRC-002)
- endpoint type
- primary: progression-free survival by blinded independent central review, 10.3 vs 7.5 months, HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.85), P<0.001 (SRC-002; the sponsor release gives P=0.0008, SRC-005); 12-month PFS 46.1% vs 26.7%; objective response 58.9% vs 31.1%; overall survival immature at 38.9% maturity (SRC-002) with 101 of 112 (90.2%) chemotherapy patients crossed over (SRC-008); grade 3 or higher adverse events 75.5% vs 56.7% (SRC-002); serious adverse events 45.4% vs 26.7% (SRC-008). Data cutoff read as 2026-01-16 from 'As of January 16, 2026, 324 patients were randomized' (SRC-005), which the release states as a randomization-count date; the NEJM abstract gives no cutoff date.
- approved competitors in class
- No archived file names an approved first-line regimen for this population, and no archived file states the current NCCN first-line recommendation set for it. What the archive supports: the sponsor's 'no oral targeted therapies have been approved for the first-line treatment' and 'first-line treatment ... largely relies on chemotherapy-based regimens' (SRC-007); the Cancer Discovery news item names amivantamab with lazertinib for atypical EGFR mutations and nothing for exon 20 insertions first-line (SRC-009). FF-001 records amivantamab with carboplatin/pemetrexed as FDA-approved first-line and widely reported as the NCCN category 1 preferred option, from secondary sources archived nowhere in this repo. Load-bearing on both legs if right — a preferred regimen already in place is the main argument for a slower listing (FF-001) and for a standard review clock (FF-002) — and unverified by the archive.
- months since last guideline revision
- unknown in months. The archive fixes a lower bound on version count, not a date: NCCN NSCLC Version 6.2026 existed by July 2026 (SRC-006 footnote 1, 'Accessed July 2026'; repeated in SRC-001 dated 2026-09-01). Six or more versions in seven months is a cadence of roughly one a month; the date of the latest version at the cutoff, and whether any version after 6.2026 exists, are not in the archive.
- panel cycle position
- unknown — see months_since_last_guideline_revision. At the cadence the archive implies, ten or more NSCLC versions fall inside the eleven-month window, so procedural opportunity for the NCCN leg after any in-window FDA action is close to certain; the position of the window in the cycle is not known.
- sponsor request status
- FDA leg: supplemental NDA submitted on or before 2026-07-14 (SRC-006) and accepted on or before 2026-09-01 (SRC-001); receipt date, filing date, designation and goal date undisclosed; press release only. NCCN leg: unknown — NCCN does not publish manufacturer submission requests.
- odac referral
- none announced in any archived file as of the availability cutoff; the advisory-committee calendar is not archived (absence claim)
- sponsor state change
- AstraZeneca entered an exclusive global licence with Dizal on 2026-07-14 ($600m upfront, up to $900m in milestones; SRC-006) and announced its completion on 2026-09-01, four days before this cutoff, with a US launch of the second-line indication planned for the fourth quarter of 2026 (SRC-001) — a change in the commercial capacity behind both regulatory and guideline engagement. The application holder of record in openFDA is still DIZAL as of 2026-09-02 (SRC-003).
Sources
Everything the estimate was built from
Each was retrieved on or before the 2026-09-22 cutoff and archived at the digest shown. If a publisher edits a page after the fact, the digest stops matching and the substitution is visible.
-
SRC-001AstraZeneca press release dated 2026-09-01 (BUSINESS WIRE, BioSpace carriage) announcing completion of the global licence from Dizal. Load-bearing for both legs of the ordering. FDA leg: the only archived statement that the first-line supplemental NDA 'has been accepted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)', with no acceptance date, review designation or goal date. NCCN leg: the latest archived statement of the guideline state — sunvozertinib 'is recommended as a subsequent therapy option' in the NCCN NSCLC guideline, footnoted to Version 6.2026 accessed July 2026 — so no first-line listing had appeared in the version the sponsor read in July 2026, two months after the NEJM publication. Also: Breakthrough Therapy Designation 'in this setting' from FDA and China's CDE; US launch of the second-line indication planned for Q4 2026. Bytes retrieved 2026-09-04 for the fda-nsclc-sunvozertinib-first-line-approval draft (its SRC-001); copied here unchanged 2026-09-05. -
SRC-002PubMed E-utilities XML for the NEJM primary publication (PMID 42212913, doi 10.1056/NEJMoa2604461, published online 2026-05-29), 'First-Line Sunvozertinib in NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations'. The evidence event both legs respond to: n=324 (163 vs 161), carboplatin-pemetrexed control, PFS 10.3 vs 7.5 months by BICR, HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.85), P<0.001, overall survival immature (38.9% maturity), grade 3 or higher adverse events 75.5% vs 56.7%. Archived via PubMed because nejm.org serves a bot-challenge page. FF-001 holds an earlier retrieval (2026-07-31) of the same record with different bytes under nccn-nsclc-sunvozertinib-1l/SRC-002; this is the 2026-09-04 retrieval made for the fda-nsclc-sunvozertinib-first-line-approval draft (its SRC-002), copied here unchanged 2026-09-05. -
SRC-003openFDA Drugs@FDA record for application NDA219839 (ZEGFROVY, sponsor DIZAL), meta.last_updated 2026-09-02. Starting state of the FDA leg: exactly one submission, ORIG-1, submission_status AP dated 20250702, review_priority PRIORITY; no supplement is present, so the FDA event has not occurred at the cutoff. Also the resolution source for the FDA date; this copy was queried by brand name, the resolution rule queries by application_number. Bytes retrieved 2026-09-04 for the fda-nsclc-sunvozertinib-first-line-approval draft (its SRC-003) and copied here unchanged 2026-09-05, so the FDA starting state is read one day before this draft's cutoff — see contingency_notes. -
SRC-005Dizal press release dated 2026-05-29 announcing the WU-KONG28 results at ASCO with simultaneous NEJM publication — the date the evidence became detectable (t_detectable). Source for 'As of January 16, 2026, 324 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio', the byte from which the 2026-01-16 date in covariates.endpoint_type and clocks.t_evidence is read (as the data cutoff, t_evidence), P=0.0008, the 'open-label' design, 15 countries, prior US and China accelerated approvals in relapsed/refractory disease, and that China's NMPA 'accepted and granted Priority Review designation' to the first-line NDA — wording no archived file uses for the US supplement, which matters for when the FDA leg lands. Bytes retrieved 2026-07-31 for FF-001 (its SRC-001); copied here unchanged 2026-09-05. -
SRC-006AstraZeneca press release dated 2026-07-14 announcing the exclusive global licence agreement with Dizal. FDA leg: a supplemental NDA for the first-line setting 'has been submitted' to FDA, fixing receipt on or before 2026-07-14, with Breakthrough Therapy Designation in this setting. NCCN leg: sunvozertinib 'is included in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for NSCLC as a Category 2A recommended subsequent therapy option', footnote 1 citing Version 6.2026 accessed July 2026 — the only archived statement of the category, and evidence that at least six NSCLC versions were issued in 2026 by July. Bytes retrieved 2026-07-31 for FF-001 (its SRC-003); copied here unchanged 2026-09-05. -
SRC-007Dizal press release dated 2026-05-27 announcing China NMPA acceptance with priority review of the first-line NDA. Source for FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation 'for this treatment-naive patient population' and for the sponsor's statement that 'no oral targeted therapies have been approved for the first-line treatment of EGFR exon20ins NSCLC' and that first-line treatment 'largely relies on chemotherapy-based regimens' — the sponsor's account of what the guideline and the regulator each have in front of them. Bytes retrieved 2026-07-31 for FF-001 (its SRC-004); copied here unchanged 2026-09-05. -
SRC-008The ASCO Post report (posted 2026-06-08) on the WU-KONG28 NEJM paper. Independent secondary reporting; source for enrolment December 2022 to May 2025, median follow-up 24.0 vs 18.0 months, crossover of 101 of 112 (90.2%) chemotherapy patients, serious adverse events 45.4% vs 26.7%. The facts a slow FDA review or a cautious panel would most plausibly cite. Bytes retrieved 2026-07-31 for FF-001 (its SRC-005); copied here unchanged 2026-09-05. -
SRC-009PubMed record for the Cancer Discovery news item 'Rare EGFRm NSCLC: More First-Line Options Emerge' (PMID 42224429, 2026-07-01). Contemporaneous field read: sunvozertinib, 'an approved later-line option', 'also looks effective up front, besting chemotherapy'; the only other agent it names is amivantamab with lazertinib for atypical EGFR mutations. It says nothing about any guideline or regulatory timetable and names no approved first-line exon 20 insertion regimen. Bytes retrieved 2026-07-31 for FF-001 (its SRC-006); copied here unchanged 2026-09-05.
One more archived source, a secondary summary the record does not rely on, is held in the ledger and not listed here.